ArticleBrain informatics2026
Investigating functional brain networks in multiple sclerosis patients: a graph theory approach for evaluating working memory impairment.
Article in Brain informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study introduces a graph theory-based machine learning framework to analyze functional brain networks in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients during working memory tasks. Using fMRI data from 22 participants (8 MS patients/14 controls) performing a Persian n-back task, we constructed functional connectivity networks with an automated anatomical labeling atlas (116 regions). Novel methodological contributions include: a proportional thresholding approach (5-80% connectivity strength) to optimize network analysis, and extraction of six graph-theoretic features (degree, clustering coefficient, betweenness/eigenvector/page-rank/k-coreness centrality) for classification. Machine learning models (SVM, decision trees, kNN) were trained on task-specific networks (1-back, 2-back, 3-back), with leave-one-subject-out validation. The 3-back task (high cognitive load) yielded superior classification (95.5% accuracy) using SVM with degree, k-coreness, and eigenvector centrality features, outperforming traditional resting-state approaches. Key innovations include identification of the cerebellum (1-back) and orbitofrontal cortex (3-back) as novel discriminative hubs, and demonstration that task difficulty modulates network separability. Results indicate MS patients exhibit impaired high-load connectivity patterns, with the proposed framework showing potential as an auxiliary diagnostic tool. The study provides both a technical blueprint for task-based network analysis and clinically relevant insights into MS-related cognitive impairment, bridging engineering methodologies with neurological applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.