ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2026
Productivity-based sampling for field-scale soil organic carbon mapping: from regional models to carbon farming needs.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates an innovative field-scale targeted sampling strategy within a regional hybrid spatial prediction model that combines machine learning and geostatistics. The framework is designed so that newly collected field observations are incorporated only through the local residual kriging step, while the regional Random Forest trend model remains unchanged, allowing field-scale predictions to be refined without full model refitting. The proposed sampling approach integrates a Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI)-based Productivity Index, a field-specific index derived from long-term satellite-based NDVI time series, with regional model-derived prediction uncertainty. The approach was evaluated on 28 test agricultural fields containing 7 to 19 in-field soil organic carbon (SOC) observations, which allowed assessment across diverse sampling configurations and levels of within-field variability. The results showed that the regional model alone provided a reasonable baseline prediction (mean root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.24% SOC) but was unable to adequately represent local spatial heterogeneity. Incorporating all available field observations produced the highest accuracy (mean RMSE = 0.17% SOC), while the proposed targeted sampling strategy achieved comparable performance (mean RMSE = 0.18% SOC) using only four strategically selected samples. In contrast, the results also showed that seemingly representative random sampling can lead to poor predictions when informative locations are missed, in some cases performing even worse than the regional model alone. In addition to conventional accuracy metrics, minimum detectable change (MDC) was used to evaluate the capability of the framework to detect meaningful SOC changes beyond prediction error, relevant for SOC monitoring and carbon farming. The results demonstrate that integrating regional models with productivity-based targeted sampling can substantially improve field-scale SOC prediction while avoiding the risks of misleading assessments associated with unfavorable sampling configurations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.