Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42606679›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2026

Leveraging Informal Caregiving Skills to Reach Rural Contexts: Results from Continued Pilot Testing of the Friends and Family for Mental Health Program.

Samuel Murphy, Daniel Strunk, Jennifer Cheavens

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samuel MurphyDepartment of Psychology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, USA. stm316@msstate.edu.
Daniel StrunkDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.
Jennifer CheavensDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychological treatment is a pressing unmet need, especially in rural areas. One potential means of addressing this need is to enhance informal care, a form of care frequently relied on by rural adults with psychological symptoms. In this study, 150 participants were randomized to either a group based psychological intervention or a waitlist control condition. Primary analyses evaluated potential condition differences in informal care skills, coping skills, and mental health symptoms. Intervention participants experienced greater informal caregiving skill gains following the program, though these gains were not maintained at the two-month follow-up assessment. Additionally, those in the intervention condition perceived depression to be more responsible for their functional impairment following participation in the program, but not at the two-month follow-up. Participants did not report changes following the intervention or at the two-month follow-up to coping skills, anxiety symptoms, or depression symptoms. Attrition prior to the intervention was high for those in the intervention condition. Findings demonstrate that the friends and family for mental health program improves informal caregiving skills, but limitations related to attrition suggest caution is warranted when interpreting these findings. Additionally, intervention benefits were only short-term. Future efforts evaluating interventions directed at informal caregivers in rural communities are encouraged to consider ways to maintain benefits and reduce attrition.

Indexed as

Coping skillsInformal caregivingInterventionMental healthRural

Identifiers

PMID42606679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.