ReviewInfection2026
Bacteriophage therapy and antimicrobial resistance: a scoping review using the "One Health" framework.
Review in Infection, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents a growing challenge across human, animal, and environmental health sectors. Bacteriophage therapy is a potential strategy against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), one of the most significant contributors to AMR-associated morbidity and mortality globally. One Health promotes coordinated action across sectors to address AMR. This scoping review directly compares the therapeutic potential of bacteriophage therapy to antibiotic treatment for MRSA infections using bacterial load as the primary outcome measure and examines the implications of these findings within a One Health framework for combatting AMR.
methodsPubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched for articles published from 2010 to 2026. Inclusion criteria were studies comparing bacteriophage therapy with antibiotics regimens for MRSA infections and reporting quantifiable bacterial load outcomes.
resultsOut of 2,160 articles identified, 29 met the inclusion criteria. Nine studies demonstrated significant bacterial load reduction with phages compared to antibiotics alone; 20 did not demonstrate phage superiority, and 19 demonstrated possible synergistic and/or additive bacterial load reduction when phages were combined with antibiotics.
conclusionPhages show promise as both monotherapy and adjunctive treatment for resistant MRSA infections, with phage-antibiotic combination therapy demonstrating superior outcomes in the majority of studies. Heterogeneity in infection models and phage selection limits direct comparisons across studies. No included studies explicitly addressed One Health. This highlights an important gap in the literature. While integration using a One Health framework is theoretically promising, further clinical investigations are needed to clarify the role of phage therapy within One Health strategies addressing AMR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42606672What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.