Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42606672›Full record

ReviewInfection2026

Bacteriophage therapy and antimicrobial resistance: a scoping review using the "One Health" framework.

Sharat Kamath, Ryan Graff, Andrew Stevens, Drake Dzierwa, Joana Tome, Jessica S Schwind

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Infection, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sharat KamathCentral Michigan University College of Medicine, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, USA. kamat1ss@cmich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4943-0402
Ryan GraffCentral Michigan University College of Medicine, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7979-6416
Andrew StevensCentral Michigan University College of Medicine, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, USA.
Drake DzierwaCentral Michigan University College of Medicine, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, USA.
Joana TomeInstitute for Health Logistics & Analytics, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9483-1064
Jessica S SchwindInstitute for Health Logistics & Analytics, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2056-0182

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents a growing challenge across human, animal, and environmental health sectors. Bacteriophage therapy is a potential strategy against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), one of the most significant contributors to AMR-associated morbidity and mortality globally. One Health promotes coordinated action across sectors to address AMR. This scoping review directly compares the therapeutic potential of bacteriophage therapy to antibiotic treatment for MRSA infections using bacterial load as the primary outcome measure and examines the implications of these findings within a One Health framework for combatting AMR.

methodsPubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched for articles published from 2010 to 2026. Inclusion criteria were studies comparing bacteriophage therapy with antibiotics regimens for MRSA infections and reporting quantifiable bacterial load outcomes.

resultsOut of 2,160 articles identified, 29 met the inclusion criteria. Nine studies demonstrated significant bacterial load reduction with phages compared to antibiotics alone; 20 did not demonstrate phage superiority, and 19 demonstrated possible synergistic and/or additive bacterial load reduction when phages were combined with antibiotics.

conclusionPhages show promise as both monotherapy and adjunctive treatment for resistant MRSA infections, with phage-antibiotic combination therapy demonstrating superior outcomes in the majority of studies. Heterogeneity in infection models and phage selection limits direct comparisons across studies. No included studies explicitly addressed One Health. This highlights an important gap in the literature. While integration using a One Health framework is theoretically promising, further clinical investigations are needed to clarify the role of phage therapy within One Health strategies addressing AMR.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial resistanceBacteriophage therapyMRSAOne healthScoping review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.