Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42606648›Full record

ArticleHuman cell2026

Integrative bulk and single-cell transcriptomics identify a recurrence-prognostic risk model with exploratory associations with treatment-response phenotypes in colorectal cancer.

Shuai Li, Jingxian Li, Xianyue Bu, Mei Han, Ganggang Shi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Human cell, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shuai Li *Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-7239-1649
Jingxian Li *The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Xianyue BuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Mei HanDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China. hanmei2003@163.com.
Ganggang ShiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China. shigg0306@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemoresistance remains a major obstacle to improving outcomes in colorectal cancer (CRC), particularly among patients receiving 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based therapy. Here, we developed a READ-derived response-associated gene signature for recurrence stratification and performed exploratory cross-cohort evaluation in additional colorectal cancer cohorts, while further exploring its association with treatment-response phenotypes. In the GSE190826 cohort, pathological complete response (pCR) versus non-pCR status was used as a clinically annotated treatment-response phenotype for downstream screening. Using differential expression analysis in TCGA-READ, we identified 4277 differentially expressed genes and constructed a weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to define clinically relevant modules. Genes from READ-related modules were further screened by logistic regression in GSE190826 and univariate Cox regression in TCGA-READ, yielding six prognostic genes associated with pathological non-response. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox regression subsequently refined these candidates to a four-gene signature, including ENHO, BLACAT1, LEMD1, and ASNS, which was used to establish a READ-derived response-associated gene (RDRG) risk score. High-risk patients showed poorer recurrence-free survival in the TCGA-READ training set and an exploratory TCGA-READ testing subset, and exploratory evaluations in additional colorectal cancer cohorts (TCGA-COAD and GSE17536) showed similar recurrence-stratification trends, with moderate time-dependent AUC values in TCGA-READ (3-year AUC = 0.766; 5-year AUC = 0.714). Multivariate Cox analyses showed that the risk score remained associated with RFS after adjustment for clinical covariates, and a nomogram incorporating disease stage provided additional exploratory prognostic stratification. The RDRG score also showed only modest and exploratory associations with treatment-response phenotypes across multiple datasets. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis revealed that malignant cells contributed the highest risk scores, with enrichment of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), KRAS signaling, coagulation, and hypoxia-related programs in high-risk tumor cells. Among the four genes, LEMD1 showed the strongest malignant-cell enrichment and was further examined in functional assays, where LEMD1 knockdown reduced CRC cell migration and increased 5-FU sensitivity, supporting its role as a candidate functional contributor rather than a validated mechanistic driver. Collectively, the RDRG risk score may serve as a READ-derived model for recurrence stratification, with exploratory cross-cohort applicability in broader colorectal cancer cohorts and exploratory associations with treatment-response phenotypes. The same risk-score formula was applied across cohorts, whereas high- and low-risk thresholds were cohort-specific rather than fixed from the training cohort.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptomeDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFluorouracilGene Expression ProfilingHumansPhenotypePrognosisRiskSingle-Cell Gene Expression AnalysisTreatment OutcomeFluorouracil5-FUCRCRecurrence stratificationscRNA-seqTreatment response

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.