ArticlePain and therapy2026
Phenotypic Factors and Celecoxib Efficacy in Knee OA: A Post‑hoc Pooled Analysis of Two Randomized, Double‑Blind, Placebo‑Controlled Trials.
Article in Pain and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionKnee osteoarthritis (OA) is a major cause of disability worldwide and disproportionately affects women and individuals with obesity. Treatment response might vary by sex and body mass index (BMI). This study assessed whether celecoxib pain reduction differs across sex (male versus female) or BMI (obese ≥ 30 kg/m
methodsThis post hoc pooled analysis included two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (NH49-96-02-060; NH49-98-02-087). Adults with knee OA flare and baseline VAS pain ≥ 40 mm received placebo, 100 mg of celecoxib twice daily (BID), or 200 mg once daily (OD) for 6 weeks. Mild baseline pain was excluded to align with original trial criteria. The full analysis set (FAS) included patients with ≥ 1 dose and ≥ 1 post-baseline assessment. Primary subgroups were assessed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with last observation carried forward (LOCF) for missing data, with longitudinal evaluation at Week 2 and 6 using mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). Sensitivity analyses using alternative imputation methods were also performed.
resultsA total of 1360 participants (427 men, 933 women) were included. Baseline VAS pain score was higher in women and patients with obesity (both p < 0.0001), who also showed greater placebo response. At Week 6, both celecoxib regimens significantly reduced pain versus placebo across sex and BMI subgroups. Women had greater observed pain reductions with similar efficacy between sexes, and obese participants showed comparable benefit with both doses. Similar findings were observed in MMRM analyses. Celecoxib provided rapid, sustained OA pain relief across the two subpopulations.
conclusions100 mg of celecoxib BID and 200 mg OD showed consistent analgesic efficacy across sex and BMI subgroups, despite higher baseline pain and stronger placebo response in women and obese participants. These findings support the use of either regimen across diverse OA patient profiles and suggest that baseline pain differences do not necessarily reduce response to cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.