ArticleEuropean journal of public health2026
Substance use disorders among refugee and non-refugee immigrants in Sweden.
Article in European journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence is inconclusive on whether immigrants are at higher risk of substance use disorders compared to non-immigrants. We investigated the risk of drug and alcohol use disorder (DUD and AUD) in first- and second-generation immigrants with refugee and non-refugee backgrounds using the nationwide Swedish longitudinal healthcare and legal registers. We included 798 141 males and 756 903 females who turned 16 years of age between 2005 and 2020. DUD and AUD were identified between ages 16 and 25 years using healthcare and legal registers. Immigrants were categorized into first- and second-generation refugees and non-refugees. Cox proportional hazard models estimated DUD and AUD risk in relation to immigrant status (non-immigrants as reference), adjusting for covariates. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using healthcare register data only. DUD risks were higher among most refugee and non-refugee immigrants compared to non-immigrants, i.e. hazard ratios (HRs) ranged from HR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.95-1.15 (first-generation female refugees) to HR: 2.63, 95% CI: 2.54-2.73 (first-generation male refugees). AUD risks among immigrants were lower or similar to non-immigrants, i.e. HRs ranged from HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.49-0.62 (first-generation female refugees) to HR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.03-1.34 (first-generation male non-refugees). Sensitivity analyses restricted to healthcare registers yielded somewhat attenuated associations for DUD, particularly among first-generation male refugees. Refugee and non-refugee immigrants in Sweden were generally at elevated risk of DUD, whereas AUD risks were largely similar to or lower than that of non-immigrants. The findings were broadly robust in analyses restricted to healthcare data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.