ArticleEuropean journal of public health2026
'So, this feels very different and, you know, kindly': a mixed methods study of arts on prescription in secondary care.
Article in European journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Arts on Prescription (AoP) programmes occur within primary care and community settings. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of AoP delivered in secondary care, on patient wellbeing, social connection, and experiences of care. A mixed-methods design was used. Quantitative data were collected from 61 patients referred to AoP through secondary care outpatient services for cancer, chronic pain, weight management, breathlessness, or neuromuscular conditions. Wellbeing and loneliness were assessed pre- and post-participation in the AoP programme. Mood and loneliness were assessed before and after each arts workshop. Qualitative methods focused on experiences of AoP and were collected through semi-structured interviews and focus groups (n = 12) and analysed using thematic analysis. Wellbeing scores increased significantly over the course of the programme, alongside reductions in loneliness. Arts workshops increased relaxation, contentment, and social connection. Thematic analysis led to four themes: (i) Connection to others-feeling supported, inspired, and understood; (ii) Making space-providing relaxing, protected time; (iii) Becoming-renewed confidence, and opening to new opportunities; and (iv) Relationships with healthcare-reframing interactions with secondary care, validating referrals, and supporting the management of health conditions. AoP in secondary care demonstrates potential as an effective approach, replicating effects in primary care, including improved wellbeing and social connection. However, additional merits in this context relate to healthcare relationships, and using the arts to manage health conditions. Embedding AoP within secondary care may reduce burden on services by supporting psychosocial needs alongside medical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.