ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Using a Consensus Reference Standard to Achieve High Reliability in Grading Aortic Stenosis in an Academic Pediatric Echo Lab.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accuracy and reliability are important in grading aortic stenosis (AS) by echocardiogram. There are no pediatric-specific consensus guidelines for grading AS by echo. Our objective was to adopt a consensus reference standard for AS and evaluate resulting interrater reliability in a pediatric echo laboratory. A reference standard for grading AS was derived from published adult guidelines. Measurements for mean gradient and aortic valve area as determined by the continuity equation were included. Comparisons were made between AS grades on 20 historic echo reports and AS grades using the new reference standard. Additionally, 6 readers used the reference standard to grade 10 studies prospectively and interrater reliability was evaluated for measurements required for grading AS and overall AS grade. Twenty echo studies were included (median subject age 7 IQR 4-16 years, median weight 32.2 IQR 13.8-44.8 kg). AS grade on historic echo reports and AS grade using new reference standard were in agreement 85% of the time. In the prospective portion of the study there was substantial agreement between raters on overall AS grade (Fleiss' kappa statistic 0.76 95% CI 0.54-0.98). There was excellent interrater reliability in measures of peak gradient (ICC 0.92, 95% CI 0.82-0.98), mean gradient (ICC 0.95, 95% CI 0.88-0.98), left ventricular outflow tract diameter (ICC 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-0.99), and left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (ICC 0.94, 95% CI 0.75-0.99). Using a consensus reference standard for grading AS may result in high interrater reliability in pediatric echo labs. Measurements of the mean gradient and measurements needed for the continuity equation for aortic valve area have high interrater reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42606543What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.