ArticleJournal of neuromuscular diseases2026
Longitudinal overview of symptomatic and immunosuppressive drugs in LEMS.
Article in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) is a rare autoimmune neuromuscular junction disorder characterized by muscle weakness and autonomic dysfunction. While amifampridine is the established first-line symptomatic treatment, longitudinal data regarding the evolution of therapeutic regimens over time and the use of immunosuppressive therapies remain limited. This retrospective study analyzed 70 LEMS patients treated at the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) between 1992 and 2023. Treatment was evaluated and a four-point "leg score" was developed and used to retrospectively quantify functional impairment and response to amifampridine. Sixty-six percent of the cohort was female, the median age of diagnosis was 54 years and non-tumor LEMS was more prevalent (77%). All patients used amifampridine at some point, and 91% initiated it within six months of diagnosis. Amifampridine improved leg scores in 57% of patients. Although 58% of patients reported side effects (mostly paresthesia), discontinuation was rare (7%). Pyridostigmine was used in 81% of patients. Immunosuppressive drug use-predominantly prednisolone and azathioprine -increased over time, reaching 44% after five years. Conversely, azathioprine, prednisolone and pyridostigmine were discontinued by 50%, 38% and 32% of patients, respectively, often due to adverse effects. In conclusion, amifampridine provides significant clinical benefits and remains the cornerstone of LEMS therapy. Immunomodulatory therapies were introduced gradually and their use increased over time. Compared with autoimmune myasthenia gravis, immunomodulatory therapy was used less frequently during the early disease course of LEMS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.