ReviewJournal of extracellular vesicles2026
Regulatory Science of Extracellular Vesicles: From ISEV Standards to Translational Implementation (Insights From Japan).
Review in Journal of extracellular vesicles, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) offer compelling opportunities for diagnostics and therapeutics, yet translation toward routine clinical use and commercial readiness remains limited. In diagnostics, EV-based assays may reach practice as laboratory-developed tests, while in therapeutics unproven "exosome" offerings have prompted safety communications, together underscoring the need for fit-for-purpose regulatory science. Here, we organize implementation challenges into six recurring bottlenecks: Identity; Purity; Potency; Measurement comparability; Manufacturing control; and Safety. We summarize how international standardization efforts led by the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV), including MISEV2023 and task-force outputs, strengthen reproducibility and comparability, while highlighting remaining gaps that arise when descriptive guidance must be converted into operational specifications and submission-ready evidence packages. Using Japan as a case example, we illustrate how regulatory-authority discussions, professional-society statements, and emerging implementation-oriented guidance can clarify review questions, distinguish therapeutic EV products from conditioned medium, and support trust-preserving translation. Finally, we propose a non-binding, deliverables-based roadmap across near-, mid-, and long-term horizons to enable clinical and commercial readiness. The roadmap should be adapted to product context, risk profile, and jurisdiction, and it emphasizes precompetitive collaboration across academia, industry, and government to build shared infrastructure for measurement, standardization, reproducibility, and quality evaluation, thereby translating scientific consensus into operational development and review frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.