ArticleJournal of rehabilitation medicine2026
Clinical factors associated with motor imagery ability in individuals with subacute stroke.
Article in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the associations of motor recovery stage, proprioceptive function, and working memory with motor imagery ability in patients with subacute stroke.
designMulticentre cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: Forty patients with subacute stroke who had complete data.
methodsMotor imagery ability was assessed using mental chronometry during a Purdue Pegboard task. Associations with motor recovery stage, proprioceptive function, and working memory were examined using correlation and multiple regression analyses. An exploratory linear support vector machine analysis was performed to classify participants into groups with higher and lower motor imagery ability using these variables.
resultsMotor imagery ability was significantly associated with motor recovery stage and proprioceptive function in the correlation analyses. However, these associations were no longer independently significant after adjustment in the multiple regression analysis. A linear support vector machine achieved an area under the curve of 0.716, with an accuracy of 0.700, sensitivity of 0.800, and specificity of 0.600. Permutation testing confirmed that the classification performance was above chance.
conclusionMotor imagery ability may be related to a combination of motor, sensory, and cognitive functions rather than any single functional domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.