Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42605897›Full record

Trial reportCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions2026

Final 2-Year Results of the REFORM Study: A Randomized Trial of Biolimus DCB Versus Paclitaxel DCB for In-Stent Restenosis.

Daniel O'Callaghan, J J Coughlan, Fernando Alfonso, Joo-Yong Hahn, Manel Sabate, Ralph Toelg, Samuel Copt, Sean Fitzgerald, Marie-Claude Morice, Jasper Trevelyan and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04079192 (A Prospective, Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of the BA9TM Drug Coated Balloon for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04079192 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Prospective, Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of the BA9TM Drug Coated Balloon for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis: First-in-Man Trial (REFORM)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBiosensors Europe SARan2020 to 2024Enrolled201ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease, In-Stent RestenosisArmsBiolimus A9 Drug Coated Balloon, SeQuent Please Paclitaxel Drug Coated Balloon
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Daniel O'CallaghanSchool of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4480-9990
J J CoughlanSchool of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6086-3279
Fernando AlfonsoHospital Universitario de La Princesa, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Cardiovaculares, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, IIS-IP, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7480-2511
Joo-Yong HahnSamsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Manel SabateHospital Clinical de Barcelona, Cardiovascular Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Ralph ToelgHeart Center of Segeberger Kliniken, Bad Segeberg, Germany.
Samuel CoptBiosensors Europe, Morges, Switzerland.
Sean FitzgeraldCardiovascular Research Institute, Mater Private Network, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3754-3183
Marie-Claude MoriceInstitut Cardiovasculaire Paris-Sud, Ramsay, Centre Européen de Recherche Cardiovasculaire, Massy, France.
Jasper TrevelyanWorcestershire Royal Hospital, Worcester, UK.
Darren MylotteUniversity Hospital and National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Antonio Fernandez OrtizCardiovascular Institute, San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Rory DurandCardiovascular Research Institute, Mater Private Network, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2712-2131
Jochen WöhrleDepartment of Cardiology and Intensive Care, Medical Campus Lake Constance, Friedrichshafen, Germany.
Franz Xever KleberPGS, Academic Teaching Hospital, University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Giuilo StefaniniHumanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Himanshu RaiSchool of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3917-1934
Peter O'KaneRoyal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5245-4547
Robert A ByrneSchool of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5224-6393

Funding

Biosensors Europe
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the REFORM trial, treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a Biolimus A9™ drug-coated balloon (BCB) was found to be inferior with respect to in-segment percentage stenosis at 6-months in comparison to treatment with a standard paclitaxel coated paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB).

aimsIn this manuscript, the final prespecified 2-year clinical follow up follow-up of the REFORM trial is reported.

methodsThe Prospective, Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of the Biolimus A9™ Drug Coated Balloon for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis: First-in-Man Trial (REFORM) was a multicenter, single blind, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial comparing the BCB and PCB in the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR). The primary angiographic endpoint of the trial was in-segment % diameter stenosis (%DS) at 6 months, which has previously been reported. A total clinical follow-up duration of 2 years was planned. Prespecified clinical outcomes at 2 years were: target lesion failure (TLF), target vessel failure (TVF), and their individual components.

resultsAt 24 months, complete follow-up data was available for 93% (n = 188) of the intention to treat (ITT) population. The mean age was 68.7 years, and patients were predominantly male (80.2%). Comorbidities were well balanced between the 2 groups, including diabetes mellitus, which was present in 31% of the BCB group and 29.2% of the PCB group. ISR lesions were predominantly DES-ISR in both groups (BCB 80.7% vs. PCB 85.1%). Through to 2 year follow up, target lesion failure (TLF) occurred in 36 of 135 patients (27.8%) of patients in the BCB group and in 15 of 67 patients (23.5%) in the PCB group (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.69-2.29). Clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) occurred in 31 of 135 patients (24.2%) in the BCB group versus 13 of 67 patients (20.4%) in the PCB group (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.66-2.40). Target vessel myocardial infarction and cardiac death were comparable in both groups.

conclusionIn patients with coronary ISR, the final 2-year results from the REFORM study show that TLF rates were 27.8% in the biolimus-coated balloon BCB group and 23.5% in the paclitaxel-coated balloon PCB group. However, given the limited sample size and wide confidence intervals, the present analysis does not permit reliable inference regarding comparative event rates between treatment strategies. The results should be interpreted against the background of demonstrated inferior angiographic performance of the biolimus DCB at 6 months.

trial registrationThe trial was registered prospectively at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (identifier: NCT04079192).

Indexed as

Angioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCardiac CathetersCoronary RestenosisDrug-Eluting StentsPaclitaxelPercutaneous Coronary InterventionSirolimusAgedCardiovascular AgentsCoated Materials, BiocompatibleCoronary AngiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesCardiovascular AgentsCoated Materials, BiocompatiblePaclitaxelSirolimusumirolimusdrug‐coated balloonin‐stent restenosispercutaneous coronary interventionrandomized

Identifiers

PMID42605897
PMCPMC13667306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.