Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42605788›Full record

ArticleAnimal models and experimental medicine2026

Comparative analysis of TP53 gene in Tupaia belangeri subspecies (Tupaia belangeri yaoshanensis vs. Tupaia belangeri chinensis) and identification of mutations in spontaneous tumor cases.

Yingying Cao, Haibo Tang, Liang Liang, Jing Leng, Weijian Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal models and experimental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yingying CaoGuangxi University, Nanning, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4224-4516
Haibo TangGuangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Liang LiangGuangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Jing LengGuangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Weijian HuangGuangxi University, Nanning, China.

Funding

Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine 2023QN002The Foundation of Guangxi Educational Committee 2023KY0321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri) is an emerging animal model for human diseases, yet the status of the critical tumor suppressor TP53 in its subspecies and spontaneous tumors is unknown. We sequenced the entire TP53 coding region from two subspecies, T. b. yaoshanensis and T. b. chinensis, and analyzed two spontaneous sarcomas from T. b. yaoshanensis using histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and cDNA sequencing with clonal validation. TP53 showed 99.5% nucleotide identity between subspecies, with a single fixed non-synonymous substitution (D42G) in T. b. yaoshanensis predicted to be functionally neutral. All residues corresponding to human cancer hotspots were strictly conserved, and structural modeling confirmed high similarity to human p53 (RMSD = 0.6 Å). Critically, we identified TP53 sequence variants in both spontaneous tumors: a missense variant (Ser175Gly) in the DNA-binding domain of a liposarcoma and another (Met344Thr) in the tetramerization domain of a myxofibrosarcoma. Computational prediction suggested both missense variants are tolerated (SIFT scores 0.61 and 0.77), and their functional significance remains to be determined. This study provides preliminary evidence of TP53 variants in spontaneous tree shrew tumors and reveals natural subspecies variation. The high conservation of p53 reinforces the tree shrew's relevance as a model for TP53-related cancer research, although further functional studies are needed.

Indexed as

cancer modelsequence variantsspontaneous tumorssubspecies variationTP53tree shrew

Identifiers

PMID42605788
PMCPMC13479160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.