ArticleJournal of morphology2026
The Impact of Food Properties on Jaw Movements in Rodents: A Comparison Between Myomorphous and Hystricomorphous Species.
Article in Journal of morphology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rodents can be divided into three major morphological groups (myomorphy, sciuromorphy, and hystricomorphy; additionally, protogomorphy can be found in only one recent species) based on the configuration of the skull and jaw muscles. These three morphotypes have been suggested to be adapted to different food types and allow for different chewing movements. Previous authors have postulated that the masticatory grinding movements should occur mostly in the antero-posterior direction, but other studies have suggested that different degrees of antero-posterior movement may occur across the rodent tree of life and in response to differences in food properties. Here, we use 3D reconstructed movements from X-Ray videos to show that both morphology and food type influence masticatory movements in two myomorphous and two hystricomorphous rodents. Yet, while hystricomorphs do not change the frequency of their masticatory movements in response to different food items, myomorphs do so. Additionally, myomorphs and hystricomorphs that exhibit propalinal chewing movements tend to possess a relatively lower mandibular condyle. Overall, our data suggest that molar morphology, in connection with dietary habits, directly influences masticatory movements. These results show that relatively small differences in a relatively conserved bauplan can have a large impact on jaw movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.