Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42605618›Full record

ReviewAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2026

Data-Driven Materials Science for Energy-Sustainable Applications.

Jacqueline M Cole

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jacqueline M ColeRay Dolby Centre, Cavendish Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1552-8743

Funding

AIchemy EP/Y028759/1AIchemy EP/Y028775/1APRIL EP/Y029763/1Sir Henry Royce Institute EP/R00661X/1UK Research and Innovation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Materials science is underpinned by structure-property relationships that govern the function of a material. These relationships can be encoded into algorithms and integrated into machine-learning models that enable the prediction of materials and their cognate properties. However, machine-learning models are largely being trained on computed data owing to a worldwide shortage of real-world (experimental) datasets. This review describes how to capture and collate experimental data from scientific literature using artificial-intelligence (AI) methods to produce materials-domain-specific datasets or language models. Their application in AI-driven enquiries that facilitate progress in energy-sustainable materials science is then illustrated via six case studies that cover: training machine-learning models, data-driven materials discovery, optimizing manufacturing processes, mapping phases of materials, forecasting materials-centric research trends, and classifying types of materials using automated prompt engineering. The future of materials-domain-specific datasets, language models, and decision-making workflows using AI agents is then envisioned for the energy sector. The intrinsic challenges of accessing historical dark data in materials science are then described and contrasted with timely opportunities for leveraging massive amounts of experimental data from laboratories in going forwards; by exploiting electronic-lab notebooks, high-throughput experiments, and digital-twin technologies. These opportunities are illustrated for energy-sustainable materials science, especially the photovoltaic and battery industries.

Indexed as

batteriesdata extractionmagnetic materialsmaterials discoveryphotovoltaicssustainable manufacturingthermoelectrics

Identifiers

PMID42605618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.