ReviewChemSusChem2026
Chemical Recycling of Waste Wind-Turbine Blades Through Polymer Deconstruction and Upcycling.
Review in ChemSusChem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Chemical Recycling of Waste Wind-Turbine Blades Through Polymer Deconstruction and Upcycling.ChemSusChem · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid expansion of the wind energy industry is generating an increasing volume of waste wind-turbine blades (WWTB), creating an urgent need for efficient and sustainable recycling technologies. Composed primarily of cross-linked epoxy resins reinforced with glass or carbon fibers, WWTB are inherently difficult to recycle, resulting in substantial resource loss and environmental burdens. Chemical recycling has emerged as one of the most promising approaches because it enables the selective cleavage of C─O, C─C, and C─N bonds within thermoset networks, allowing controlled depolymerization while preserving the value of reinforcing fibers. This review presents a comprehensive, mechanism-oriented perspective by establishing a unified framework that integrates substrate structure, bond-cleavage mechanisms, reaction-pathway regulation, catalyst design, product separation, and product valorization. It reveals how the intrinsic chemical structure of thermoset composites governs bond activation, directs reaction pathways, and ultimately determines recycling efficiency and product selectivity. Guided by this framework, we examine recent advances in catalytic degradation, reactor design, downstream separation, and the high-value utilization of recovered fibers and depolymerization products. Finally, we discuss the key scientific challenges and future directions for developing efficient, selective, and sustainable recycling technologies for WWTB and other thermoset composites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.