ReviewCureus2026
Pudendal Nerve Entrapment Within Alcock's Canal as a Compartment-Like Syndrome: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pudendal nerve entrapment (PNE) within Alcock's canal is an under-recognized cause of chronic pelvic and perineal pain, increasingly conceptualized as a compartment-like syndrome due to sustained neurovascular compression within a confined fascial space. This systematic review evaluates the anatomical, pathophysiological, diagnostic, and therapeutic evidence supporting this hypothesis. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from April 2026 to May 1, 2026, in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Ten studies were included in the final synthesis, comprising observational studies, cadaveric anatomical analyses, imaging-based diagnostic studies, and interventional and surgical outcome studies. Sample sizes ranged from a cadaveric series of 15-20 specimens to clinical cohorts exceeding 200 patients. Evidence consistently demonstrated that repetitive mechanical stress, fascial constriction, and impaired venous drainage within Alcock's canal may lead to ischemic neuropathy and progressive pudendal dysfunction. Diagnostic modalities such as magnetic resonance (MR) neurography, Nantes criteria, and nerve blocks improved clinical identification, while surgical decompression showed variable but often favorable outcomes. However, significant heterogeneity, small sample sizes, and a lack of standardized outcome measures limit definitive conclusions. Overall, current evidence supports a compartment-like pathophysiology, although further prospective validation is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.