ArticleCureus2026
Safety of Additional Local Anesthetics Soon After Liposomal Bupivacaine: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) produces a prolonged serum bupivacaine level. It carries a warning to avoid additional local anesthetics for 96 hours due to a theoretical additive risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST). Whether patients exposed to additional local anesthetics soon after LB have a clinically detectable increased risk of LAST is unknown. Materials and methods Data from a single academic center were used in a cohort study of adults who received LB intraoperatively. The exposure was to additional local anesthetics within 96 hours of LB administration, and the outcome was a composite of electronic medical record data indicating possible LAST. The cumulative incidence and hazard of possible LAST (with weighted adjustment for propensity to exposure to additional local anesthetics) were calculated. A propensity score-matched sensitivity analysis was performed using an outcome based on a manual chart review. Results We identified 4306 patients who received LB, of whom 466 (12.1%) were exposed to additional local anesthetics within 96 hours of LB. There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of possible LAST between exposed and unexposed patients (0.9% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.28) as compared to unexposed and no significant increase in the unadjusted hazard (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.18-1.42, p = 0.21) or the adjusted hazard (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.89, p = 0.033) of possible LAST after exposure to additional local anesthetic. The sensitivity analysis had similar findings. Conclusions We found no evidence that exposure to additional local anesthetics within 96 hours of LB administration increases the hazard of possible LAST.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.