ReviewCureus2026
Artificial Intelligence Across the Echocardiographic Workflow: A Narrative Review for Clinicians.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Echocardiography is one of the most commonly used diagnostic methods in cardiovascular diseases because it is non-invasive, widely available, and capable of providing real-time assessment of function and cardiac structure. Despite these advantages, conventional echocardiography is often limited by operator dependence, interobserver inconstancy, the time-intensive nature of manual acquisition and measurement. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning, have created new opportunities to automate multiple steps of the echocardiographic workflow, starting from image acquisition and view classification to chamber segmentation, functional quantification, and hemodynamic estimation. This review provides an overview of the current clinical applications of artificial intelligence (AI) throughout the echocardiographic workflow. It focuses on key areas where AI has been applied, including automated view recognition, image quality assessment, cardiac phase identification, chamber segmentation, left ventricular ejection fraction estimation, strain analysis, and prediction of hemodynamic and disease-related parameters. Major challenges limiting wider clinical implementation were also highlighted in this review, such as insufficient external validation, dependence on image quality, differences between ultrasound vendors and patient populations, limited model interpretability, and lack of clear evidence demonstrating improved patient outcomes. Several AI-based tools, particularly those for automated view classification and chamber quantification, are becoming increasingly integrated into routine clinical practice, but many more advanced applications are possible, for which research is ongoing. The successful adoption of AI in echocardiography will depend not only on continued improvements in algorithm performance, but also on rigorous clinical validation, smooth integration into existing workflows, transparent reporting of model development and evaluation, and evidence that these technologies provide meaningful benefits for patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.