ArticleSpine surgery and related research2026
Risk Factors for Cement Leakage into Segmental Veins during Posterior Spinal Fusion Using Fenestrated Pedicle Screws.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Although fenestrated screws enhance pull-out strength, cement leakage into segmental veins carries a risk of pulmonary embolism. This study aimed to identify factors that contribute to cement leakage during posterior spinal fusion with fenestrated screws. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 32 patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion with fenestrated pedicle screws. A total of 147 screws were evaluated using postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Risk factors were assessed by measuring vertebral CT values, the volume of injected cement and its ratio to vertebral body volume, and screw positioning parameters, including deviation and distance to the anterior and lateral walls. Results: Cement leakage occurred in 75% of patients (24 of 32) and in 35% of screws (52 of 147). All leakages were classified as leakage into segmental veins. No symptomatic pulmonary embolism was observed. The thoracic spine exhibited a higher leakage rate than the lumbar spine (47.5% vs. 28.4%, p<0.05). Leakage was significantly associated with shorter distances from the screw tip to the anterior (5.1 mm vs. 7.8 mm) and lateral (4.8 mm vs. 7.3 mm) vertebral walls, as well as a higher cement-to-vertebral-volume ratio (7.1% vs. 4.7%, p<0.01). Leakage also correlated with higher CT values in the posterior vertebral region (126 Hounsfield Unit [HU] vs. 103 HU; p<0.05). Screw deviation showed no association. Conclusions: Proximity of the screw tip to the anterior and lateral walls, as well as excessive cement injection relative to vertebral body size, significantly increases the risk of leakage. To mitigate this risk, screws should be placed centrally within the vertebral body and at a safe distance from the cortical boundaries. The amount of injected cement should also be determined according to the volume of the individual vertebral body. These findings provide practical guidance for safer screw placement in spinal fusion using fenestrated screws.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.