ReviewNigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime/Avibactam Against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli in Niger.
Review in Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rise of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (MDR-GNB) necessitates the evaluation of new antibiotics such as ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA). Data on its efficacy in Niger is scarce. This study assessed the in vitro activity of CZA against clinical MDR-GNB isolates. Methodology: This prospective cross-sectional study was carried out on 306 non-duplicate MDR-GNB isolates from a National Reference Laboratory from December 2023 to November 2024. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed, and CZA resistance rates were determined. Statistical analysis identified factors associated with resistance. Results: Overall, 23.4% of MDR isolates were resistant to CZA. However, resistance varied dramatically by phenotype: 7.6% in ESBL-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), 33.3% in carbapenem-resistant Conclusion: CZA demonstrates potent activity against ESBL-E in Niger, supporting its role as a carbapenem-sparing agent. However, the high resistance rates in CRE and CRAB preclude its empirical use for suspected infections with these pathogens. These findings underscore the critical need for routine CZA susceptibility testing and enhanced stewardship to preserve its utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42605433PMC13477690What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.