Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42605403›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Bilateral Corneal Dystrophy Revealing Mucolipidosis Type IV: A Case Report.

Boutaina Bousellam, Hibat Allah Eddaoui, Aniss Regragui, Nabiha Benchekroun, Mohamed Belmekki

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Boutaina BousellamOphthalmology, Abulcasis International University of Health Sciences, Cheikh Zaid Hospital, Rabat, MAR.
Hibat Allah EddaouiOphthalmology, Abulcasis International University of Health Sciences, Cheikh Zaid Hospital, Rabat, MAR.
Aniss RegraguiOphthalmology, Abulcasis International University of Health Sciences, Cheikh Zaid Hospital, Rabat, MAR.
Nabiha BenchekrounOphthalmology, Abulcasis International University of Health Sciences, Cheikh Zaid Hospital, Rabat, MAR.
Mohamed BelmekkiOphthalmology, Abulcasis International University of Health Sciences, Cheikh Zaid Hospital, Rabat, MAR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A nine-year-old boy, the only child of non-consanguineous parents, presented with progressive bilateral visual impairment and corneal clouding since birth. Ocular examination showed bilateral epithelial-stromal corneal dystrophy associated with photophobia, blepharospasm, alternating esotropia, and nystagmus. Visual acuity was limited to light perception in both eyes, with normal intraocular pressure. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) demonstrated diffuse epithelial-stromal thickening with hyperreflective anterior stroma. Flash electroretinography (ERG) was normal, while flash visual evoked potentials (VEP) revealed bilateral optic neuropathy. Systemic examination noted severe psychomotor impairment, hypotonia, and facial dysmorphism. Whole-exome sequencing identified a homozygous nonsense mutation in MCOLN1 (c.169C>T p.Arg57*), confirming mucolipidosis type IV. Mucolipidosis type IV is a rare autosomal-recessive lysosomal storage disorder combining ocular and neurological manifestations. In children with congenital corneal opacity and developmental delay, metabolic and genetic evaluation should be systematically pursued. Corneal transplantation is not recommended because of recurrence risk; management is supportive and multidisciplinary.

Indexed as

as-oct findingscorneal dystrophygenetic counselinglysosomal diseasemcoln1mucolipidosis type ivpediatric ophthalmology

Identifiers

PMID42605403
PMCPMC13477790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.