ArticleCureus2026
Persistence of Covert but Not Overt Corrective Saccades in Darkness: Insights From Unilateral and Bilateral Vestibular Loss.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Corrective saccades identified during the video head impulse test (vHIT) are commonly classified as overt or covert according to their timing relative to head movement. Although overt saccades are generally considered visually driven, the mechanisms underlying covert saccades remain incompletely understood. We report two illustrative cases of vestibular hypofunction evaluated with vHIT under standard illuminated conditions and in complete darkness. The first patient had unilateral vestibular loss, whereas the second had bilateral vestibular loss. In both cases, overt corrective saccades observed during testing in light conditions disappeared in darkness, while covert saccades remained detectable. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that overt and covert corrective saccades may rely, at least in part, on different physiological mechanisms. The abolition of overt saccades following elimination of visual feedback is consistent with a visually mediated origin. In contrast, the persistence of covert saccades suggests participation of non-visual pathways involved in gaze stabilization. The observed latencies were compatible with previously reported latencies of cervical proprioceptive responses, including the cervico-ocular reflex (COR), although a direct causal relationship cannot be established from the present observations. This simple light-versus-darkness vHIT protocol may provide a clinically accessible approach for exploring compensatory gaze stabilization mechanisms in patients with vestibular disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.