ReviewPatient preference and adherence2026
Follow-Up Management in Patients with Chronic Atrophic Gastritis: An Evidence-Based Summary.
Review in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To summarize the best evidence for the follow-up management of patients with chronic atrophic gastritis and provide a reference for clinical follow-up management. Methods: Following the "6S" evidence model, domestic and foreign databases, guideline websites and relevant association websites were systematically searched for evidence on the follow-up management of patients with chronic atrophic gastritis, including clinical decisions, guidelines, expert consensus, evidence summaries and systematic reviews, etc. The search time limit was from January 2015 to October 2025. Two researchers independently used corresponding tools to evaluate the quality of the included literature and extract the evidence. Results: A total of 13 literatures were included, including 1 clinical decision, 7 guidelines, 4 expert consensus and 1 systematic review. Thirty‑two pieces of evidence were summarized from 8 aspects such as the necessity of follow-up, the mode of follow-up, the eradication treatment and management of Conclusion: The evidence summarized in this study can provide an evidence-based basis for the follow-up management of patients with chronic atrophic gastritis, which can help to optimize clinical practice and improve patient prognosis and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.