ArticleJournal of public health research2026
Post-marketing safety signals, therapeutic failure, and product-use issues reported with injectable Cabenuva: A FAERS disproportionality analysis.
Article in Journal of public health research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cabenuva (cabotegravir/rilpivirine) is the first complete long-acting injectable regimen for HIV-1 treatment. As its use expands, post-marketing surveillance should address not only conventional adverse reactions, but also therapeutic failure and product-use or administration-related issues. This study aimed to characterize Cabenuva-associated reports submitted to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from Q4 2019 to Q3 2024. Methods: Cabenuva-associated FAERS reports were extracted and coded using MedDRA v27.1. Disproportionality analysis and Bayesian models were applied for signal detection. Subgroup analyses by sex and age were conducted using reporting odds ratios and interpreted as exploratory. Time-to-onset (TTO) was calculated from treatment start date to event onset date when valid dates were available. Results: A total of 3,497 reports including 22,738 Cabenuva-associated event records were identified. The detected PTs included established adverse reactions, therapeutic failure or disease-progression terms, product-use and administration issues, exposure circumstances, and sparse unexpected findings. Frequently reported clinically relevant events included injection-site pain, injection-site nodule, and depression. Prominent implementation-related terms included product dose omission issue, inappropriate schedule of product administration, and product administration error. Sparse unexpected PTs were interpreted as hypothesis-generating observations rather than established adverse reactions. Conclusions: This study provides a broad post-marketing signal-screening profile of Cabenuva, highlighting both known safety concerns and real-world implementation issues such as missed doses, administration problems, product issues, and therapeutic failure. The findings support careful clinical monitoring, adherence to administration guidance, staff training, and further validation of sparse unexpected signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.