ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2026
Outcomes of Internal Brace Augmentation Alone vs Broström Repair With Internal Brace for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability.
Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Broström procedure and its modifications remain the gold standard for surgical treatment of chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI). Internal brace augmentation has gained popularity because of its enhanced mechanical stability and potential to facilitate earlier rehabilitation. However, the effectiveness of internal brace augmentation without formal ligament repair remains unclear. This study compared 1-year postoperative outcomes between standalone internal brace augmentation and modified Broström repair with internal brace augmentation. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all lateral ankle stabilization procedures performed at a single academic center between January 2017 and December 2020. Patients were grouped by surgical technique: (1) Internal Brace Alone, defined as suture-tape augmentation without formal ligament repair (ST), and (2) Broström + Internal Brace. Outcomes assessed at a minimum follow-up of 1 year included satisfaction, persistent pain, recurrent instability, and revision surgery. Results: A total of 80 patients met inclusion criteria, including 58 (72.5%) in the ST cohort and 22 (27.5%) in the combined cohort. Baseline demographic and comorbidity profiles were similar between groups (all Conclusion: With the sample size available, no statistically significant differences in measured 1-year outcomes could be detected between standalone internal brace augmentation and modified Broström repair with internal brace augmentation. These findings should be considered preliminary and require confirmation in adequately powered prospective studies. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.