Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42605240›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2026

Limonene Modulates Event-Related Potentials in a 2-Back Working Memory Task.

Kaori Tamura, Keitaro Yamashita, Taiki Nishimura, Toko Tatsumoto, Takumi Yano, Yuko Ohno, Shin'ichi Yoshimura, Mitsuo Tonoike

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kaori TamuraDepartment of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6458-2247
Keitaro YamashitaDepartment of Information and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Information Engineering, Fukuoka Institute of Technology, Fukuoka, Japan.
Taiki NishimuraDepartment of Information and Systems Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Fukuoka Institute of Technology, Fukuoka, Japan.
Toko TatsumotoDepartment of Mechanical and Control Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Takumi YanoDepartment of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Yuko OhnoDivision of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3469-6793
Shin'ichi YoshimuraDivision of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan.
Mitsuo TonoikeDivision of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23K11297Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 26K03018LOTTE Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOlfactory inputs can influence visual cognition. However, it remains unclear whether such effects are driven by the chemical properties of odorants or by mood-related associations, especially under conditions of high cognitive demand. This study examined whether limonene, a key citrus odorous compound, modulates cognitive processing during a visual 2-back task under different levels of perceptual load.

methodsWe developed a 2-back working memory task using color lightness discrimination. The task included both low-load (orange) and high-load (gray) conditions. Participants wore a non-woven mask impregnated with the odor solution and performed the task under two odor conditions: limonene exposure and no odor. An electroencephalogram was recorded to evaluate P300 amplitude at central (Cz) and parietal (Pz) electrodes.

resultsBehavioral results, analyzed using signal detection theory, showed that the correct response rate and sensitivity index (d') were higher for orange than for gray stimuli, regardless of the odor condition. Event-related potential (ERP) analysis revealed a significant interaction; under the limonene exposure condition, P300 amplitudes were reduced for gray stimuli, but remained stable for orange stimuli.

conclusionsOur findings indicate that limonene modulates neural markers associated with attentional and decision-related processing, particularly under high cognitive demand, without clear effects on behavioral performance. The observed P300 suppression suggests that this component may be sensitive to decreases in attentional allocation that behavioral measures failed to detect. Moreover, these results replicate and extend previous findings of limonene-induced P300 suppression, supporting the reproducibility of limonene's modulatory effect on neural markers of cross-modal attentional processing.

Indexed as

Event-Related Potentials, P300LimoneneMemory, Short-TermOlfactory PerceptionAttentionColor PerceptionCuesElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleOdorantsPhotic StimulationYoung AdultLimonenelimonenemultimodal processP300 amplitudesworking memory

Identifiers

PMID42605240
PMCPMC13478842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.