ArticleJournal of nursing management2026
Beyond Transition: A Substantive Grounded Theory of Forward Escaping Among Newly Qualified Nurses.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond Transition: A Substantive Grounded Theory of Forward Escaping Among Newly Qualified Nurses.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly-career nurse attrition is recognised as a critical nursing management and workforce governance challenge worldwide. Despite investment in structured transition programmes, alarming retention rates amongst newly qualified nurses persist, particularly in contexts where nursing traditionally occupies a low or ambiguous social position. Evidence informing management and policy responses to early-career mobility in such settings is limited.
methodsA classic grounded theory design explored transition experiences and their nursing management implications among newly qualified nurses in Western Saudi Arabia. Data were collected through conversational, in-person interviews with 33 participants, 19 newly qualified nurses and 14 key informants, across two institutions, supplemented by document analysis. Data were analysed using constant comparative analysis following the classic grounded theory tradition of Glaser and Strauss to guide theory development.
resultsAnalysis generated nine categories integrated into three subcore categories, Acquiescing, Reconcile and Perseverance, and one core category, Forward Escaping. This theory conceptualises newly qualified nurses remaining in the profession while strategically orienting towards roles offering greater autonomy, social legitimacy and advancement. Departure from bedside nursing reflected ambivalence shaped by social stigma, limited role clarity and constrained career pathways, rather than professional disengagement. Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 reform agenda, expanding advanced practice visibility and leadership pipelines, further shaped nurses' workforce orientations, offering lessons for other reform-driven health systems.
conclusionThe Forward Escaping substantive theory challenges management strategies that rely predominantly on career progression as a retention lever, highlighting the risk of neglecting persistent bedside conditions. Sustainable workforce retention requires nursing leadership to integrate career mobility structures with active investment in bedside role quality, recognition and working conditions. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nurse managers and leaders must move beyond advancement-focused retention models to address professional recognition and role clarity at the bedside. Governance frameworks should align workforce policy with healthcare reform agendas to elevate nursing's social standing, strengthen leadership pipelines and embed evidence-based management practices that sustain newly qualified nurses where patient care demand is greatest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.