ArticleJournal of environmental quality
Groundwater delivery of neonicotinoids to streams.
Article in Journal of environmental quality. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Groundwater delivery of neonicotinoids to streams.Journal of environmental qualityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neonicotinoids are mobile and persistent insecticides whose presence in streams poses a threat to stream invertebrates. This study sought to understand how stream baseflow concentrations of three common neonicotinoids relate to their delivery in groundwater from agricultural land. In a study area with large areas of irrigated potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) and vegetable crops, some grain and dairy agriculture, and small areas of suburban development, neonicotinoid concentrations in streams exceeded the aquatic life benchmarks for imidacloprid and clothianidin at the sites with higher percentages of potato and vegetable crops in their groundwater contributing area. The stream concentrations are similar to field-edge groundwater concentrations after adjusting for the density of agricultural land cover within a groundwater travel-time corresponding to their usage period and assuming the neonicotinoids persist or degrade slowly in the aquifer. If neonicotinoids do not degrade in the aquifer, the stream concentrations can be explained by a mean loss to groundwater from the land in potato and vegetable agriculture of 0.16 (range 0.002-0.3) g ha
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.