ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2026
Adolescent personal care product use and social media engagement: a pilot study in NJ high school students.
Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPersonal care products (PCPs) are a ubiquitous, modifiable source of chemical exposures. Although numerous studies have characterized behaviors and perceptions around adult PCP use, little is known about PCP use in adolescence, a critical developmental period.
objectiveCharacterize adolescent PCP use in New Jersey, USA in relation to sociodemographic characteristics, precautionary behaviors, and social media consumption.
methodsWith a local high school, we designed and administered a pilot survey to students (n = 143). Students reported on PCP use (within the past 24 h as well as general habits), precautionary behaviors they use when choosing products (e.g., using healthy product apps), and social media habits. For each participant, we tallied the number of products used overall and by product type (e.g., skin care, cosmetics). We fitted multivariable negative binomial models examining the number of products used in relation to precautionary behaviors and social media consumption. Secondarily, we fitted models restricted to females.
resultsFemales used twice as many products as males in the past 24 h (median (inter-quartile range), females: 14(8), males: 7(3)). Although 41% reported avoiding products containing certain chemicals, few students engaged in precautionary behaviors when selecting products, such as reading ingredient lists (19%) or using healthy product apps or websites (5%). In multivariable models, few associations were observed between precautionary behaviors and the number of PCPs used. However, there were consistent positive associations between social media consumption and the number of products used. For example, above median daily time spent on social media (Incidence Rate Ratio [IRR]: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.09), following influencers with product lines (IRR:1.30, 95% CI: 1.11, 1.52) and watching hair/beauty tutorials (IRR:1.40, 95% CI: 1.21, 1.63) were associated with greater PCP use in the last 24 h. Results were robust to analyses of occasional PCP use (at least once in the past 6 months) as well as in analyses restricted to females. IMPACT: In adolescents, PCP use was comparable to prior studies among adults, while engagement in precautionary behaviors that could reduce chemical exposures was infrequent. Higher social media engagement was associated with greater PCP use. Interventions leveraging social media and influencers may be an effective strategy to improve environmental health behaviors related to PCP use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42604935What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.