Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42604911›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

How Can QM Methods Be Used to Guide Synthesis Planning in Drug Discovery?

Jemima Haque

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jemima HaqueEvotec (UK) Ltd., Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK. Jemima.Haque@evotec.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantum mechanical (QM) methods are traditionally used in drug discovery to support molecular design and property prediction; however, they are becoming increasingly important for evaluating synthetic feasibility during the Design-Make-Test-Analyze (DMTA) cycle. As modern tools such as virtual screening and machine-learning workflows rapidly propose many potential candidate molecules, their progression ultimately depends on whether they can be prepared efficiently in the laboratory. QM approaches provide a mechanistically grounded framework for evaluating thermodynamic and kinetic feasibility, predicting selectivity, and identifying competing reaction pathways before experimental effort is invested. This chapter reviews how QM methods can guide synthesis planning by complementing chemist expertise, literature precedent, and computer-assisted synthesis planning (CASP) tools. The application of density functional theory (DFT) to evaluate reaction energetics, transition states, and stereochemical outcomes is discussed, as well as the role of QM-derived reactivity descriptors to enable the quantitative ranking of retrosynthetic disconnections. An automated reaction-path exploration method is also highlighted for analyzing complex pericyclic and stereochemically rich transformations. These approaches demonstrate how QM-driven synthesis planning can support the identification of synthetically accessible drug candidates and advance progress in making the compounds, which is often the rate-limiting step in drug discovery. Some shortcomings of QM methods are also acknowledged, particularly the difficulty of fully modeling complex chemical reactions, which consequently restricts the breadth of their practical applications.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryQuantum MechanicsQuantum TheoryDrug DesignThermodynamicsAutomated reaction-path explorationComputer-assisted synthesis planningDensity functional theoryDMTA cycleDrug discoveryMedicinal chemistryNatural product synthesisNucleophilicity and electrophilicityPericyclic reactionsQuantum mechanicsReaction energeticsReactivity descriptorsRetrosynthetic analysisStereoselectivitySynthetic feasibility

Identifiers

PMID42604911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.