ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026
Prognostic value of the dual-tracer PET score (NETPET) in neuroendocrine tumors with [
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based PET/CT mixture-of-experts model for relapse risk stratification in relapsed/refractory classical hodgkin lymphoma: a multicenter study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the association between baseline NETPET score and prognosis in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) receiving [
methodsThis retrospective study included patients with NETs treated with [
resultsForty-eight patients were enrolled (P1: n = 14, P2-4: n = 22, P5: n = 12). The P1 group achieved significantly better PFS than the P2-4 and P5 groups (2-year PFS rates: 0.83 vs. 0.32 vs. 0.10; log-rank P < 0.0001). Univariate analysis revealed a significant association of NETPET score with PFS (P2-4 vs. P1: HR = 7.07, P = 0.009; P5 vs. P1: HR = 17.0, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated the NETPET score to be independently associated with PFS (P2-4 vs. P1: P = 0.003; P5 vs. P1: P < 0.001). Its predictive value for overall survival was limited (P > 0.05).
conclusionThe NETPET score was independently associated with progression-free survival and may serve as a potential imaging biomarker for pretreatment risk stratification in NET patients receiving [
Indexed as
Identifiers
42604891What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.