Trial reportCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2026
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic sub-study of trans-arterial vs. intravenous gemcitabine in the TIGeR-PaC phase 3 clinical trial.
Trial report in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03257033 (Targeted Intra-arterial Gemcitabine vs. Continuation of IV Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Following Induction With Sequential IV Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel and Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Targeted Intra-arterial Gemcitabine vs. Continuation of IV Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Following Induction With Sequential IV Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel and Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLocalized intra-arterial delivery of gemcitabine (IAG) may provide advantages in terms of increased tissue concentration and decreased systemic dosing. We hypothesized IAG may result in decreased systemic gemcitabine concentration and associated side effects due to intracellular delivery prior to conversion to gemcitabine's inactive metabolite, difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU). Here we report the results of a pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics sub-study within the TIGeR-PaC phase 3 clinical trial (NCT03257033).
methodsAnalyses were performed for 16 participants across 6 TIGeR-PaC study sites; 11 participants received localized IAG and 5 participants received systemic intravenous gemcitabine (IVG). Gemcitabine and dFdU assays were performed on blood samples collected immediately before, during, and after infusion. CA 19 - 9 levels were measured prior to and 2 weeks after IAG treatment. Maximum plasma drug concentration (C
resultsIAG resulted in lower gemcitabine C
conclusionIn addition to providing increased local potency, localized IAG, in which gemcitabine is rapidly converted to its inactive metabolite dFdU, may also be beneficial in decreasing gemcitabine-related systemic side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.