Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42604733›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2026

Using Ongoing Wildlife Surveillance Programs to Monitor Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria in the Environment.

María Rincón-Gracia, Stefan Börjesson, Robert Söderlund, Hanna Woksepp, Aleksija Neimanis, Henrik Uhlhorn, Thomas Rosendal, David Winlund, Hugo Uddströmer, Josef D Järhult and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

María Rincón-GraciaDepartment of Animal Health and Antimicrobial Strategies, Swedish Veterinary Agency, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7804-9437
Stefan BörjessonDepartment of Animal Health, Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Ås, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2219-2659
Robert SöderlundDepartment of Microbiology, Swedish Veterinary Agency, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1604-3393
Hanna WokseppDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Aleksija NeimanisDepartment of Pathology and Wildlife Diseases, Swedish Veterinary Agency, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7747-2290
Henrik UhlhornDepartment of Pathology and Wildlife Diseases, Swedish Veterinary Agency, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1004-9989
Thomas RosendalDepartment of Epidemiology, Swedish Veterinary Agency, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6576-9668
David WinlundClinical Department of Surgery and Gastroenterology, Malmö, Sweden.
Hugo UddströmerRegion Dalarna, Mora lasarett, Mora, Sweden.
Josef D JärhultDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7075-1059
Jonas BonnedahlDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 869178-AquaticPollutantsSvenska Forskningsrådet Formas FR-2021/0001Vetenskapsrådet 2020-05697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The need to include wildlife in surveillance programs for antibiotic resistance has been previously highlighted. In the present study, we explored the possibility of sampling Swedish wildlife in conjunction with ongoing monitoring programs for wildlife health and disease to evaluate the occurrence of antibiotic resistance. The animals included in the study represented different trophic levels and degrees of interaction with humans, namely bears, eagles, wolves, foxes, otters, and hares. Samples were screened for ESBL-, pAmpC-, and carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli using selective media, and indicator E. coli was also isolated from each sample. All isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility, and a subset of isolates was genome sequenced. Two samples from foxes were found to carry ESBL- or pAmpC-producing isolates, while no carbapenemase-producing E. coli could be detected. Geographical information on the samples and genetic characterization of the ESBL- and pAmpC-producing isolates suggest that proximity to anthropogenic settings could play a role in the occurrence of antibiotic resistance in wildlife. In addition, the study demonstrated that the use of ongoing wildlife surveillance programs presents a cost-efficient possibility to monitor antibiotic resistance in wild animals. However, future studies and monitoring programs should take careful consideration regarding selection of animal species and distribution.

Indexed as

Animals, WildBacteriaDrug Resistance, BacterialEnvironmental MonitoringEscherichia coliAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSwedenAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-Lactamasescarbapenemaseantibiotic resistancemolecular epidemiologysurveillancewildlife

Identifiers

PMID42604733
PMCPMC13477815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.