Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42604443›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

Expectations and Experiences of Peer Mentors in Supporting People With Osteoarthritis and Socioeconomic Disadvantage: A Multi-Method Exploration of Challenges and Lessons Learned.

Elizabeth Lavender, Samantha Mason, Anna M Anderson, Linda Eckersley, Susan Barry, Gretl A McHugh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth LavenderSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0226-8847
Samantha MasonSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0306-8353
Anna M AndersonSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4048-6880
Linda EckersleySchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Susan BarrySchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Gretl A McHughSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5766-5885

Funding

Nuffield Foundation and Arthritis UK OBF/FR-000023819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOsteoarthritis and other multiple long-term conditions disproportionately affect people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage, leading to complex and intersecting health and wellbeing needs. Peer mentorship can support self-management and complement condition specific care. Delivering effective peer mentorship remains challenging. The overall study aim was to develop and assess feasibility and perceived usefulness of a remotely delivered osteoarthritis peer mentorship intervention. This paper explores peer mentors' experiences of delivering the peer mentorship programme, their preparedness for the role and the challenges they faced.

methodsFourteen volunteers were trained as peer mentors to deliver the peer mentorship programme to 30 mentees. Mentors completed training evaluations, summaries of mentorship sessions and participated in a semi-structured qualitative interview. Data sources were combined to form a narrative of the peer mentors' perceptions and experiences, pre and post intervention delivery.

resultsTwelve peer mentors completed training evaluations, sessions summaries and were interviewed. Three key themes were developed: aligning expectations of the peer mentoring role with mentoring experience; preparedness for peer mentoring; and peer mentorship delivery challenges.

conclusionsPeer mentorship is a potentially valuable approach to supporting people to self-manage long-term conditions such as osteoarthritis. Findings offer practical insights for designing peer mentorship programmes that align with mentors' expectations, provide adequate preparation and support, and address challenges to effective delivery. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Public contributors with hip and knee OA and experience of socioeconomic disadvantage helped develop the programme, test remote delivery and recruit mentees. They contributed to peer mentor training and supported peer mentors to deliver the programme.

Indexed as

MentoringMentorsOsteoarthritisPeer GroupFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSocioeconomic Disparities in Healthlong‐term conditionsosteoarthritispeer mentorshipself‐managementsocioeconomic disadvantage

Identifiers

PMID42604443
PMCPMC13477603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.