ReviewArchives of Iranian medicine2026
A Review of Exhaled Volatile Organic Compounds as Emerging Diagnostic Tools for Gastrointestinal Malignancies.
Review in Archives of Iranian medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in gastric cancer research: a bibliometric and visualized analysis from 1993 to 2026.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastrointestinal cancers encompass a range of malignancies, including esophageal, gastric, esophagogastric, hepatocellular, pancreatic, and intestinal cancers. Considering the prevalence of these cancers, alongside their fatal nature, and the nonspecific symptoms that often arise in the advanced stages, developing a non-invasive screening/diagnostic method capable of detecting cancer early is in high demand. Exhaled breath serves as an accessible source of biomarkers, including volatile organic compounds (VOCs), a promising type of diagnostic marker. This method requires a sample as small as five breaths. Exhaled breath analysis is conducted using different mass spectrometry methods coupled with nano sensors or neural networks. Furthermore, innovative devices like electronic noses have also shown great promise in diagnosing different types of cancers. These biomarkers show potential in reliably differentiating between healthy individuals and cancer patients. Additionally, these compounds can be utilized for cancer staging and monitoring treatment response. However, certain fallbacks persist in differentiating malignant from pre-malignant conditions. Despite the promise of this diagnostic approach, certain limitations, such as variations in VOC profiles across different populations, lack of standardized collection protocols, and absence of established universal reference standards, underscore the need for proper standardization and large-scale, multi-center validation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.