Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42604396›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Spontaneous Rupture of the Urinary Bladder: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Ekaterina Lazhovska, Gordan Lenart, David Lukanović, Ana Pflaum, Nataša Kenda Šuster

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ekaterina LazhovskaDepartment of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ljubljana University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, SVN.
Gordan LenartDepartment of Urology, Ljubljana University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, SVN.
David LukanovićDepartment of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ljubljana University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, SVN.
Ana PflaumDepartment of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ljubljana University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, SVN.
Nataša Kenda ŠusterDepartment of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ljubljana University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, SVN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rupture of the urinary bladder in the absence of trauma is an uncommon condition with a challenging diagnosis that carries a high mortality rate and usually demands immediate surgical intervention. It is commonly associated with underlying chronic bladder pathologies, such as obstructive uropathy, chronic inflammation, and radiation cystitis; in younger patients, it can occur in the setting of substance abuse. Due to its rarity and nonspecific clinical presentation, which often mimics other more common conditions such as bowel perforation, diagnosis is often delayed and made intraoperatively. We report a rare case of atraumatic bladder rupture in a 45-year-old woman presenting with a 14-day history of abdominal pain. Diagnostic laparoscopy performed for suspected peritonitis revealed a 5-7 cm horizontal rupture of the urinary bladder, which was repaired by primary suturing. The exact cause of the rupture could not be definitively established; however, substance abuse was considered a possible contributing factor, as it was the only identifiable risk factor. This case highlights the importance of considering this condition in high-risk patients presenting with an unexplained acute abdomen, particularly when associated with hematuria and renal impairment.

Indexed as

acute abdomenacute kidney injurybladder rupturehematuriaillicit psychoactive substancesperitonitis

Identifiers

PMID42604396
PMCPMC13477267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.