ArticleCureus2026
Deep Learning-Based Oral Cancer Detection Using Clinical Images.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral cancer is a significant health concern where early detection greatly improves patient outcomes. This study develops and evaluates a deep learning model to automatically detect oral cancer from clinical photographic images. A convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained on a dataset of 750 oral lesion images sourced from Kaggle, using transfer learning with EfficientNet-B0 to compensate for limited sample size. The model's performance was validated on a held-out test set and assessed with accuracy, precision, recall, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results indicate high diagnostic performance: the model achieved approximately 95% overall accuracy in distinguishing cancerous lesions from non-cancerous oral tissue. The CNN demonstrated a sensitivity of about 94% for identifying oral cancers and a specificity of about 95% for correctly recognizing non-cancer cases. The area under the ROC curve was 0.97, indicating excellent discriminative ability. Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) visualizations were used as an exploratory interpretability method to identify image regions contributing to model predictions. These heatmaps may suggest overlap between model attention and visually relevant lesion regions, but they do not confirm that the model used clinically meaningful features. These findings suggest that deep learning could serve as a valuable tool in assisting dental professionals with early oral cancer detection, though further clinical validation is required before adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.