ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2026
Experience with ocular surface disease index analysis to assess dry eye disease and related conditions in Lagos, Nigeria.
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial ocular surface disorder that remains underdiagnosed, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, where epidemiological data are limited. This study aimed to describe the distribution and severity of DED using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), and to evaluate its association with demographic factors and objective diagnostic tests among adults in Lagos, Nigeria. Methods: we conducted a hospital-based cross-sectional study involving 173 consecutive participants recruited from ophthalmology, rheumatology, and dental clinics in Lagos, Nigeria. Participants completed the OSDI questionnaire and underwent Schirmer´s test and Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) assessment. Demographic and clinical variables were analysed using STATA version 16.1. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of OSDI were evaluated against objective measures of ocular dryness. Results: the mean OSDI score was 21.2 ± 18.9. Forty percent of participants had scores within the normal range, while 24.3% had severe DED. Higher OSDI scores were observed among females, older participants, and those with a prior diagnosis of dry eye or systemic dryness symptoms, although not all associations reached statistical significance. When compared with objective tests, OSDI demonstrated high sensitivity but low specificity (7-13%). Conclusion: dry eye disease is common among adults attending tertiary clinics in Lagos and presents with heterogeneous ocular and systemic features. While OSDI is a useful high-sensitivity screening tool, its low specificity underscores the need for confirmatory objective testing. Larger population-based studies are warranted to better define the epidemiology and determinants of DED in Nigeria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.