Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42604356›Full record

ArticleJTCVS open2026

Branched stented anastomosis frozen elephant trunk repair reduces operative time and transfusion requirements in acute type A aortic dissection.

Kenichi Hashizume, Mitsuharu Mori, Tadashi Matsuoka, Kiyoshi Koizumi, Masataka Yamazaki, Naritaka Kimura, Yasunori Iida, Yorihiko Matsumoto, Hirofumi Haida, Mio Kasai and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Kenichi HashizumeDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsuharu MoriDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.
Tadashi MatsuokaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kiyoshi KoizumiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ashikaga Red Cross Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.
Masataka YamazakiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Naritaka KimuraDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasunori IidaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Saiseikai Tobu Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yorihiko MatsumotoDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirofumi HaidaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Mio KasaiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.
Hiroaki KaneyamaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ashikaga Red Cross Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.
Daiki HaradaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.
Hideaki ShimizuDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Naohiko OkiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Saiseikai Tobu Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yutaro AoyagiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.
Hideyuki ShimizuDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In acute type A aortic dissection (AADA) patients, total arch replacement (TAR) using the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique has been adopted in emergencies to promote distal false lumen (FL) thrombosis. However, TAR is technically demanding and is associated with prolonged operative time and increased intraoperative blood transfusion. We previously reported the branched stented anastomosis frozen elephant trunk repair (B-SAFER) technique. Comparative data versus conventional TAR (cTAR) adjusted for disease severity remain limited. Here we compared the early surgical outcomes of TAR using B-SAFER versus cTAR in AADA. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter, nonrandomized study included patients with AADA and a patent FL who underwent emergency TAR using B-SAFER (n = 63) and cTAR (n = 75). Propensity score matching based on EuroSCORE and JapanSCORE identified 48 matched pairs. After matching, 16 patients (33%) in the comparator group underwent conventional TAR without an FET device because of institutional practice patterns or device-related constraints. Results: The 30-day mortality was 7.3% overall (7/96), with no significant difference between the groups (6.2% for B-SAFER vs 8.3% for cTAR; Conclusions: In propensity score-matched patients with AADA, TAR using B-SAFER was safe and reproducible, with reduced operative times and transfusion requirements compared to cTAR.

Indexed as

acute type A aortic dissectionblood transfusionbranched stented anastomosis frozen elephant trunk repairfrozen elephant trunkoperative timetotal arch replacement

Identifiers

PMID42604356
PMCPMC13477136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.