Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42604350›Full record

ReviewInfection and drug resistance2026

Co-Administration of Novel Oral Polio Vaccine Type 2 and Bivalent Oral Polio Vaccine: Current Evidence, Challenges, and Implications for the Polio Eradication Endgame.

Stéphane-Hans Bateyi Mustafa, Tambwe Patrick Rodrigue, Raha Zihindula Raoul, Bigabwa Baharanyi Dominique

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infection and drug resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stéphane-Hans Bateyi MustafaDepartment of Public Health, Free University of the Great Lakes Countries (ULPGL), Goma, North Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Tambwe Patrick RodrigueMpox Incident Management System, Goma, North Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo.ORCID 0009-0000-3052-3767
Raha Zihindula RaoulDepartment of Public health, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0009-0002-8789-7254
Bigabwa Baharanyi DominiqueDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kampala International University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0009-0000-8296-8549

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global polio eradication is challenged by persistent wild poliovirus type 1 (WPV1) transmission and outbreaks of circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 (cVDPV2). The 2016 global withdrawal of the type 2 component from trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (tOPV) created population immunity gaps, facilitating cVDPV2 emergence in areas with low routine coverage. We conducted a narrative review synthesizing biological, immunological, clinical, epidemiological, and operational evidence on co-administration of novel oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 (nOPV2) with bivalent OPV (bOPV) as a strategy to rapidly expand population immunity during multi-serotype outbreaks. Co-administration provides potential logistical and equity advantages. Emerging randomized trial data, however, reveal significant immunological interference that can reduce type 2 immune responses. The effectiveness of this strategy is therefore context-dependent, with operational feasibility and coverage levels critically influencing outcomes. Co-administration of nOPV2 and bOPV should be applied as a context-specific tactical measure rather than a universal policy. Sustained high vaccination coverage and robust surveillance remain central to achieving global polio eradication.

Indexed as

bOPVnOPV2polio eradicationvaccine co-administration

Identifiers

PMID42604350
PMCPMC13477161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.