ArticlePharmacogenomics and personalized medicine2026
Implementing Pharmacogenomics in Contemporary Hospital Care: Insights from Multidisciplinary Knowledge Exchange.
Article in Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is increasingly recognised as a cornerstone of personalised medicine, with established recommendations for many commonly prescribed medicines. Despite this, translation into real-world clinical practice remains inconsistent, reflecting persistent implementation and health-system gaps. Objective: To provide a multidisciplinary perspective on the system-level conditions required to normalise PGx within contemporary hospital care, drawing on structured knowledge exchange and priority-setting across clinical, digital and governance domains. Methods: A multidisciplinary knowledge exchange program convened clinicians, pharmacists, genetic services, informatics teams, researchers and health-service leaders across oncology, transplantation, peri-operative care and palliative care. Knowledge was exchanged through presentations, informing the generation and ranking of shared priorities in groups and individually using the Nominal Group Technique. Aggregate scores were calculated, and priorities further refined. Presentation insights were synthesised using a narrative, interpretive approach, to identify cross-cutting translational themes. Results: Eleven shared priorities were identified across four broad critical levers for sustainable integration: (1) computable, reusable PGx data embedded within electronic medical records (EMR); (2) coordinated and equitable testing and prescribing pathways; (3) workforce capability and stewardship; and (4) governance. Equity, access and data sovereignty were highlighted as foundational to responsible scale-up, particularly for First Nations peoples and under-represented communities. Conclusion: Insights from this knowledge-exchange program highlight the feasibility and clinical relevance of PGx, and identify workforce capability, EMR integration, and system-level governance as critical implementation levers of adoption. Coordinated national investment and policy alignment will be central to realising the full value of PGx.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.