ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026
Using Graphic Medicine to Explore Perceptions of Professionalism in Early Medical Education: A Pilot Study.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lapses in professionalism remain a critical concern in medical education, with early unprofessional behaviors linked to adverse outcomes in clinical practice. Traditional interventions focus on reflection and mentorship, but alternative approaches such as graphic medicine may provide new opportunities for awareness and discussion. Objective: This pilot study sought to evaluate comics depicting professional and unprofessional behaviors as a tool for measuring medical student awareness of professionalism, and assess perceptual discrepancies between students and supervising faculty. Methods: Faculty at the University of Louisville School of Medicine provided examples of professional and unprofessional student behaviors. These examples were transformed into comics using ChatGPT, each depicting both classroom and clinical contexts. M2/M3 medical students and supervising faculty were then asked to rate the professionalism depicted in each comic using a Qualtrics-based survey and to provide qualitative feedback on the graphic medicine approach. Results: Faculty (N=14) and students (N=20) differed in their perception of professionalism, with students rating unprofessional behaviors as less extreme in comparison. Conversely, professional behaviors were rated more positively by faculty than by students. While both groups considered the comics realistic and engaging, participants questioned their effectiveness as a learning tool in the survey format. Students also completed the survey more quickly than faculty on average, suggesting less engagement with the material in its existing survey format. Conclusion: Discrepancies in perceptions of professionalism between students and faculty may explain lapses in medical professionalism exhibited by M2/M3 students at the University of Louisville. Though provided in survey format, graphic medicine may serve as an engaging entry point for discussion, through integration into small-group or reflective learning environments, for effective prevention of medical professional decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.