ArticleJTCVS open2026
Simulation-based modeling of aortic valve neocuspidization with oversized pericardial leaflets.
Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Aortic valve replacement in children is challenging. The lack of accommodation for somatic growth negatively impacts long-term outcomes. Data on the use of symmetrical oversized leaflets in neocuspidization are limited. We present a computer-based simulation of patient growth after a replacement with an oversized aortic valve leaflet. Methods: A new aortic valve design was modeled in silico. Three computer-simulated symmetrical leaflets, each 18 mm in nominal width, were constructed for 4 simulated aortic roots with different diameters (12, 14, 16, and 18 mm). Pressure was applied to the aortic root side to simulate diastolic pressure and valve closure. The morphology of the closed valve was evaluated across different settings to examine morphologic changes during somatic growth. Three parameters of oversizing, previously described in our in vitro and in vivo studies, were assessed across the simulations: windmill shape deviation, coaptation length, and billow below the annular plane distance. Results: A decrease in oversizing parameters was observed as the diameter of the aortic root increased. The average deviation from the windmill shape, the coaptation length, and the distance from the annular plane to the leaflet billow all decreased consistently with growth, indicating morphological adaptation of the valve geometry. These correlated changes suggest that the valve design adapts to anatomical growth by altering its functional configuration without compromising coaptation. Conclusions: Achieving optimal outcomes in aortic valve replacement in children remains challenging. Neocuspidization with oversized aortic valve leaflets addresses important limitations of current valve replacement techniques. Larger leaflets support growth by maintaining proper coaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.