ArticleJTCVS open2026
The prevalence of primary lung cancer among women with previous personal and/or family history of cancer in an integrated health system.
Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate whether personal and/or family history of cancer increases the prevalence of new primary lung cancer in adult women, regardless of smoking status. Methods: A retrospective review was performed using the data from Kaiser Permanente Northern California region electronic health record between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2022. We included all adult women without a previous personal history of lung cancer and with at least 1 year of membership during the study period. We estimated the prevalence ratio (PR) of new primary lung cancer among people with a personal or family history of cancer using targeted maximum likelihood estimation adjusting for smoking status, race/ethnicity, age, Charlson comorbidity index, and Neighborhood Deprivation Index. Results: We identified 2.8 million patients who met the selection criteria. A previous personal history of any cancer was associated with an 88% increased prevalence of lung cancer (PR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.84-1.92); a family history of any cancer also was associated with increased prevalence (PR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.20-1.26). Specifically, a previous personal history of breast, cervical, uterine, or ovarian cancers was also associated with increased prevalence. Conclusions: Personal history of previous malignancy and family history of malignancy were associated with increased prevalence of future lung cancer in our population. It suggests that smoking status alone in our population is not sufficient for gauging clinical suspicion of new primary lung cancer. Reevaluation and expansion of guidelines of screening criteria for use of lung cancer screening tools may be prudent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.