ArticleJTCVS open2026
Mitigating conduction disturbances in sutureless aortic valve surgery: A standardized anti-oversizing strategy in a large single-center program.
Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The study objectives were to characterize conduction outcomes and perioperative results in a large, consecutive, single-center program of sutureless self-expanding aortic bioprosthesis implantation and to assess the temporal impact of a standardized, nonoversizing, higher-release implant strategy on permanent pacemaker implantation. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all sutureless aortic valve procedures performed between October 2013 and March 2025 (n = 1742). Outcomes assessed were permanent pacemaker implantation for complete atrioventricular block, stroke, reexploration for bleeding, renal replacement therapy, infection, and in-hospital mortality. Prespecified subgroup analyses were performed for isolated aortic valve surgery and by surgical approach (full sternotomy vs ministernotomy). Temporal trends were examined across the program's learning curve, with 2017 marking the adoption of a standardized conservative depth, no oversizing implantation strategy. Body size index-prosthesis size interactions were explored using heat-map analyses. Results: Overall permanent pacemaker implantation occurred in 96 of 1742 patients (5.5%). Rates of stroke, reexploration for bleeding, renal replacement therapy, and in-hospital mortality were 1.7%, 4.7%, 1.8%, and 3.4%, respectively. In isolated surgery (n = 1281), ministernotomy was associated with lower stroke (0.95% vs 3.30%; Conclusions: In a large real-world sutureless aortic valve program, standardization of sizing and implant depth was associated with sustained reduction in permanent pacemaker implantation without compromising clinical outcomes. Avoidance of oversizing appears central to optimizing conduction results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.