ArticleJTCVS open2026
Effectiveness of a surgical anastomosis simulation model in hybrid supervised and independent thoracic surgery training.
Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Simulation is an increasingly important component of surgical training that often involves time-limited in-person sessions. The aim of this study is to assess the influence of a surgical simulation model used in a hybrid learning environment, including supervised and self-directed practice and to evaluate its effect on the development of technical skills in thoracic surgery trainees practicing pulmonary artery and bronchial anastomoses. Methods: Sixteen postgraduate year 6 and 7 trainees participated. The group was split into 2 training sessions: part A, dedicated to the pulmonary artery anastomosis technique, and part B, focused on the bronchial anastomosis. Participants attended an in-person demonstration followed by a hands-on practice session led by an experienced thoracic surgeon. Participants then completed an anastomosis and were assessed independently by 2 thoracic surgeons. Time to task completion (TTC), technical skill scores, and watertightness test results were recorded. Subsequently, trainees performed 10 self-directed practice sessions using the simulation model at home, documenting the results of their TTC and watertightness tests. Upon the completion of independent practice sessions, trainees were evaluated by the same 2 raters during in-person assessments. Results: The performance evaluation included a task-specific checklist, an overall impression of ability, an independent performance rating, and recorded TTC. In part A (n = 9), average task-specific checklist scores improved from 3.9 out of 7 to 6.3 out of 7 (62%; Conclusions: Hybrid simulation training is a feasible and effective method for refining and mastering surgical skills. Study participants demonstrated statistically significant performance improvements in almost all categories. A reduction in TTC and an ability to achieve a watertight anastomosis were noted, indicating an anticipated positive trend toward skill mastery. Hybrid simulation training is an effective educational approach that can help address the shortage of hands-on training opportunities among thoracic surgery trainees by providing added flexibility for practice at their own convenience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.