ArticleAsian journal of urology2026
The role of virtual reality in enhancing informed consent for shockwave lithotripsy: A mixed-methods study of physician and patient perspectives.
Article in Asian journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The integration of immersive technologies such as virtual reality (VR) in healthcare is gaining momentum, particularly in patient education and the informed consent process. Traditional patient information leaflets often fail to meet the needs of diverse populations due to literacy barriers and a lack of visual engagement. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a VR platform (Surgassists®) on patient understanding, anxiety, and satisfaction during the consent process for shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), alongside surgeon perspectives on VR's feasibility and utility. Methods: A mixed-methods, cross-sectional study was conducted between August 2024 and July 2025. One hundred patients undergoing SWL at the University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust were recruited to evaluate VR-enhanced consent using pre- and post-intervention questionnaires, including understanding, visual analogue scale pain scores, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory scores. Simultaneously, a structured electronic survey was distributed to 50 urologists across Europe, assessing familiarity, current use, and perceptions regarding VR in surgical consent. Results: Patients demonstrated significantly improved understanding (mean score increased from 2.60 to 3.72, Conclusion: VR significantly enhances patient education and emotional preparedness for SWL, with strong surgeon support for future adoption. Addressing logistical and cost-related concerns will be key to broader clinical integration. VR holds considerable promise in modernising and standardising the consent process across surgical specialties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.