ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2026
Laying the groundwork for clinical teaching in Bachelor of Science Nursing programs: findings from a grounded Delphi study.
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bachelor of Science Nursing (BScN) students are exposed to clinical placements (CP) that are vital in advancing nursing competencies, but most of them attend the placements unprepared, thereby affecting learning, decision-making and safety. Even though CPs are compulsory, preparation is often unstructured and not consistent across universities hence undermining theory-practice integration. The research objective was to formulate systematic strategies that would enhance BScN students´ readiness for clinical placements. Methods: a 15-month Grounded Delphi study was conducted in three rounds: interviews with 13 professionals, followed by surveys with 103 and 75 participants (students, nurses, and lecturers). Thematic analysis and descriptive statistics were performed, and Kruskal-Wallis tests assessed differences in ratings of preparedness strategies across groups. Results: three key strategies emerged. The theory-to-practice Sequencing strategy emphasized acquiring theoretical knowledge before clinical exposure through coordinated instruction and essential skills training. The Goal-Oriented Learning Structures strategy focused on co-developed objectives and work plans using standard tools like rotation plans and logbooks. The Experiential Preparation approach highlighted simulations, mentorship, and practical training, though resource constraints remained a major challenge across universities and teaching hospitals. Conclusion: the academic-clinical interface in BScN programs can be strengthened with purposeful strategies aimed at preparing students with CPs by sequencing theory-practice, structured clinical learning with co-developed CP objectives, and experiential readiness through simulations. Nonetheless, the strategies must be implemented in a way that is viable to overcome the existing resource constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.